This article reflects findings from Franklin Templeton’s Industry Advisory Services Annual Survey conducted between March and August of 2023.
In total, the team conducted 83 open-ended interviews with many leaders of organizations representing more than US$45 trillion in assets under management (AUM). Participants were encouraged to share their own views on interesting developments and expectations for the future of wealth and investment management. Discussions were wide-ranging and candid. Select anonymized quotes from interviewees are included throughout the final report.
To obtain comprehensive investment viewpoints, interviewees were drawn from a wide range of industry roles including asset owners (public pensions, corporate pensions, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, insurers, family offices), intermediaries (wealth managers, private banks and consultants), investment managers (asset managers, hedge funds, VCs, alternative firms), founders of fintech, blockchain and digital asset firms, industry thought leaders and academics. Interviews were done globally with about two-thirds of discussions held with domestic and global leaders of firms based in the United States, and the other third spread between Europe and Asia.
This paper spans three broad topics: where the industry sits today, warning signs indicating that a shift to a new era is approaching, and the coming era of better living through investing. Given the breadth of material covered in the study, we’ll pique your interest with the top 10 takeaways. These are just scratching the surface of each insight and we encourage you to dig deeper by reading the full paper or the key findings to better understand what these developments may mean for you and your business.
1. Today’s industry looks much different than the pre-2000s era.
In the “Set It and Forget It” era (1970s to early 2000s), the focus was on opportunistic equity and bond funds that measured outperformance relative to broad market indexes. In the “Let’s Build a Solution” era that has since emerged, the focus is on outcome-oriented and goals-based solutions comprising a diverse range of building blocks including passive and alternative funds.
2. Competitive differentiation is now based around proprietary tech platforms that take advantage of cloud computing, big data processing and the Phase I artificial intelligence (AI) toolkit – machine learning, natural language processing and predictive analytics.
Leading investment managers built new, more scientific investment platforms that can assess the factors driving returns, optimize investment team process steps, and bring together quantitative and fundamental approaches to create new investment insights. Some also built solutions platforms that focus on the portfolio level. In wealth management, market leaders created robust client content and reporting portals that allow for the deployment of journey-tracking tools and the creation of cohort analyses.
3. The engagement model between leading investment managers and wealth platforms has shifted and become more of a strategic partnership rather than a supply chain.
Leading investment managers offer “Asset Management Plus” – a platform-based approach that delivers not only alpha generation but also some range of value-added tech or service-related offerings, including innovation initiatives, knowledge services, and, for many larger firms, client-facing technology able to tailor portfolio holdings and provide tax optimization. Leading wealth platforms are utilizing these offerings to refocus their advisor networks away from the proprietary compilation of investment portfolios toward a broader focus on a client’s total financial life, including value-added offerings such as tax and estate planning, banking, lending and insurance products.
4. Warning signs indicate the current “Let’s Build a Solution” era may be ending.
5. New investment behaviors are emerging that may indicate that the third era of investment and wealth management has begun.
Today, leading investment managers engage with most institutional investors by using a toolbox approach and consultative style that crafts bespoke solutions based on the institution’s portfolio needs and thinks about the portfolio from a Chief Investment Officer’s point of view. Many retail solutions, by contrast, are standardized, and though there are many variants, the starting point with most clients is not consultative but rather a matching exercise that looks at an investor’s risk tolerance, age, and wealth. Numerous new toolbox options are narrowing the difference between many retail and institutional approaches and making the starting point for most retail discussions around retirement more consultative –“What do you need?” –versus more product-oriented –“What can I offer you?”
6. Quantitative modeling is being used to build portfolios that deliver more than just financial returns.
7. The portfolio of the future delivers “Better Living through Investing.”
Rather than being built around a standard template, the portfolio of the future is likely to be built specifically to an individual’s needs. These needs may extend beyond financial needs to encompass an individual’s societal and personal needs to help make an investor feel more aligned to their portfolio. Tokenization should allow new investment options to be included in the portfolio, such as cultural assets like art, music, games, film, fashion and collectibles. Investments can be structured to provide special perks, benefits or rewards, such as discounts, access to special communities or events, or the right to receive unique merchandise. Having a portfolio comprising these offerings should reposition the importance of the investment portfolio from something that sits to the side of an investor’s life to a key facilitator of their day-to-day activities.
8. If our prediction of the future plays out, we think most investment managers would need to add more “pluses” to their “Asset Management Plus” approach to adjust to this new model and merge their expertise-driven approach with the new hallmarks and assets associated with Web3’s social network and social capital investing.
They would need to be able to source – and potentially structure and issue – new types of tokenized investment offerings from categories that today sit completely outside many investment mandates. To do so, they may need to forge strategic relationships with niche providers and new types of subject matter experts and potentially the communities that aggregate online around those marketplaces to understand and optimally value each type of new asset. To gain the trust of Millennial, Gen Z, and Gen Alpha investors, investment managers may need to create and foster their own social network and social capital investing communities allowing users to share ideas and insights alongside professional investors and investment managers. New types of portfolio construction algorithms would be needed to “complete” the portfolios and balance the personally enriching investments with a more diversified mix of traditional investments. New relationships will also be required with experts able to structure and administer the consumer benefits, perks and rewards.
9. We also think many wealth managers would need to consider more aspects of their client’s journey including those that make up their social identity.
Knowing where a client likes to shop and eat, what they like to do for travel and entertainment, what items they covet or own, what communities they identify with and how they engage with those communities, what matters to them in terms of their home, and what pursuits describe their personal interests and passions. These are all likely to become important investment considerations as a growing range of assets can be included in a client’s portfolio offering that offers not only financial returns but other benefits or rewards. This would reposition an advisor as the investor’s life coach, extending their remit beyond just the financial life they consider today. Monitoring and modeling these data inputs will require more use of emerging generative AI tools.
10. A new financial infrastructure will be required to make these portfolios of the future a reality.
The existing system is over 50 years old, and it is hard to replace such an entrenched approach, but experimentation and change are happening.
Again, these top 10 takeaways are just the beginning of what we discovered, and we hope you’ll read further to appreciate the nuances of how the industry is evolving.